California Court of Appeal· 3/20/2014
Richman v. Hartley
Citations
- 224 Cal. App. 4th 1182
- 169 Cal. Rptr. 3d 475
- 2014 WL 1090148
- 2014 Cal. App. LEXIS 257
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that California real estate statute “applies to any transfer of real property . . . regardless of whether the property also has a commercial use” because the statute’s language did not limit its application to property that only contained residential units
- holding that California real estate statute “applies to any transfer of real property . . . regardless of whether the property also has a commercial use” because the statute’s language did not limit its application to property that only contained residential units
- “The courts have recognized the Legislature’s interest in protecting unsophisticated residential home purchasers”
- “The courts have recognized the Legislature’s interest in protecting unsophisticated residential home purchasers”
- stating the elements of such a claim under California law
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: O'Donnell
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
8 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Alki Partners, LP v. DB Fund Services, LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2016-10-24· cited 127×
- Copenbarger v. Morris Cerullo World Evangelism, Inc.California Court of Appeals, 5th District· 2018-10-19· cited 30×
- Jazz Pharm., Inc. v. Synchrony Grp., LLCE.D. Pennsylvania· 2018-12-03· cited 19×
- Stephens & Stephens XII, LLC v. Fireman's Fund InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2014-11-24· cited 16×
- Remington v. IversonSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 2025-01-02· cited 1×
- Stephens & Stephens XII v. Fireman's Fund Ins.California Court of Appeal· 2014-12-17
- Copenbarger v. Morris Cerullo World Evangelism, Inc.California Court of Appeal· 2018-11-13
- Canyon Vineyard Estates I v. DeJoriaCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2022-05-18
Cites
13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court· 2001-07-11· cited 2,941×
- Careau & Co. v. Security Pacific Business Credit, Inc.California Court of Appeal· 1990-08-17· cited 465×
- People Ex Rel. Lockyer v. Shamrock Foods Co.California Supreme Court· 2000-11-06· cited 454×
- Romano v. Rockwell International, Inc.California Supreme Court· 1996-12-16· cited 321×
- Pacific Legal Foundation v. California Coastal CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court· 1982-12-20· cited 314×
- Wilcox v. BirtwhistleCalifornia Supreme Court· 1999-11-22· cited 187×
- Easton v. StrassburgerCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1984-02-22· cited 69×
- Melissa R. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2012-07-10· cited 34×
- Kern v. County of ImperialCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1990-12-19· cited 27×
- Realmuto v. GagnardCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2003-07-07· cited 24×
- Smith v. RickardCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1988-11-18· cited 14×
- Loughrin v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1993-05-11· cited 14×
- County of Solano v. HandleryCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2007-09-21· cited 9×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.