Richardson v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Absent evidence of the length of time that the substance had been on the floor, there can be no inference that any increased level of inspecting or cleaning by [defendant] would have discovered and remedied the condition.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).