Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Tinsley

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that evidence of “small” surgical scar located on plaintiffs back and hip constituted compensable disfigurement award
• holding that evidence of “small” surgical scar located on plaintiff’s back and hip constituted compensable disfigurement award
• holding that evidence of \small\ surgical scar located on plaintiffs back and hip constituted compensable disfigurement award

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).