Richardson v. Commonwealth

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that, in a prosecution under Code § 18.2-308.2:2, the fact that the weapon had the firing capability required to distinguish it from antique weapons could be inferred from the evidence
• inference that firearm fell under Code § 18.2-308.2:2(G) permitted where no evidence presented that it had firing capacity

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Ellis v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 1999-04-20· cited 84×
• Correll v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 2004-01-28· cited 77×
• Bruce Edison Parham v. Commonwealth of Virginia
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 2015-04-07· cited 63×
• Gregory v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 1998-10-06· cited 18×
• Wilson v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 2000-02-15· cited 11×
• Justin Sarafin v. Commonwealth of Virginia
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 2013-10-08· cited 4×
• Smith v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 2010-11-23· cited 3×
• Smith v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 2010-04-27· cited 2×
• Douglas Leon Miner v. Commonwealth of Virginia
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 2024-03-12

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Frye v. Commonwealth
  Supreme Court of Virginia· 1986-06-13· cited 272×
• Bridgeman v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 1986-12-16· cited 239×
• Grant v. Commonwealth
  Supreme Court of Virginia· 1982-06-18· cited 116×
• Fleming v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 1991-12-03· cited 97×
• Snead v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 1991-02-05· cited 39×
• Brooks v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 1995-02-07· cited 14×