Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2/2/1994
Richards v. Sun Pipe Line Co.
Citations
- 636 A.2d 1162
- 431 Pa. Super. 429
- 1994 Pa. Super. LEXIS 194
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- upholding admission of owner’s testimony as to diminished property values based in part on owner’s reference to homes of similar size
- noting that there was no dispute that damage to property was permanent and irreparable when certain trees, which were removed along an easement may not be replaced or even if replaced would take 25 to 30 years before they attained the same stature of those removed
- owner may testify to the value of his property
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Wieand, Olszewski, Popovich
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Slappo v. J's Development Associates, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2002-01-30· cited 38×
- Christian v. YanoviakSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2008-03-13· cited 20×
- Matakitis v. WoodmanseeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1995-10-23· cited 15×
- Carl Bales Excavating Inc. v. Strawberry Hill Associates LPLehigh County Court of Common Pleas· 2010-08-04
- Bratina, M. v. Bunting, W.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2025-10-01
Cites
14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Lilley v. Johns-Manville Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1991-08-22· cited 84×
- Rabe v. Shoenberger Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1906-01-02· cited 57×
- Glanski v. ErvineSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1979-08-31· cited 46×
- Sgarlat Estate v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1960-01-18· cited 43×
- BELL v. ShetromSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1969-06-12· cited 26×
- Bumbarger v. WalkerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1960-09-20· cited 25×
- Kirkbride v. Lisbon Contractors, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1989-06-26· cited 25×
- Hencken v. Bethlehem Municipal Water AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1950-03-20· cited 23×
- Gross v. Jackson TownshipSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1984-06-01· cited 13×
- Savings & Trust Co. v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1911-01-03· cited 11×
- Golibart v. ReamerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1992-06-30· cited 10×
- Ernsberger v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 1987-09-16· cited 8×
- Bullock v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1912-03-18· cited 6×
- Mahaffey v. New York Central & Hudson River RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1910-10-17· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.