Skip to main content
· 8/31/1979

Glanski v. Ervine

Citations

  • 409 A.2d 425
  • 269 Pa. Super. 182
  • 1979 Pa. Super. LEXIS 2797

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • broker’s misrepresentation properly ad mitted, despite integration clause, where termite damage was not reasonably apparent
  • trial court did not err in admitting evidence of broker’s misrepresentations about the soundness of house where termite damage was not reasonably apparent
  • seller liable for his broker’s failure to disclose a condition which the seller testified that he thought that the broker had disclosed to the buyers
  • judgment upheld allowing rescission of contract for sale of property “as is” where vendor fraudulently concealed extensive termite damage
  • seller liable to buyer for failing to disclose termite infestation of property, even if seller’s misrepresentation was innocent
  • broker liable as well as seller of home

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Price, Spaeth, Lipez

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.