· 8/31/1979
Glanski v. Ervine
Citations
- 409 A.2d 425
- 269 Pa. Super. 182
- 1979 Pa. Super. LEXIS 2797
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- broker’s misrepresentation properly ad mitted, despite integration clause, where termite damage was not reasonably apparent
- trial court did not err in admitting evidence of broker’s misrepresentations about the soundness of house where termite damage was not reasonably apparent
- seller liable for his broker’s failure to disclose a condition which the seller testified that he thought that the broker had disclosed to the buyers
- judgment upheld allowing rescission of contract for sale of property “as is” where vendor fraudulently concealed extensive termite damage
- seller liable to buyer for failing to disclose termite infestation of property, even if seller’s misrepresentation was innocent
- broker liable as well as seller of home
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Price, Spaeth, Lipez
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.