Rich v. Arancio

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• declining to find that seepage from an irrigation ditch constituted a continuing nuisance because maintenance of the siphon was a “laudable occupation authorized by the laws and statutes of the state.”
• declining to find that seepage from an irrigation ditch constituted a continuing nuisance because maintenance of the siphon was a \laudable occupation authorized by the laws and statutes of the state.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).