Rice v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that trial court properly acted to cure ambiguity in verdict as originally returned in noncoercive manner
• holding that trial court acted properly to cure ambiguity in verdict where foreperson announced the jury’s verdict as “Guilty with reservations”
• holding that trial court acted properly to cure ambiguity in verdict where foreperson announced the jury’s verdict as “Guilty with reservations”
• foreperson announcing the verdict of the jury as “guilty with 9 reservations”
• foreperson announcing the verdict of the jury as “guilty with 9 reservations”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Boulden v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2010-05-14· cited 31×
• Caldwell v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2005-10-04· cited 24×
• Kelly v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2005-05-02· cited 7×
• Colvin v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2015-11-30· cited 1×

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Trimble v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1984-08-17· cited 108×
• Ford v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1859-01-24· cited 62×
• Smith v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1984-04-03· cited 46×
• Lattisaw v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1993-02-11· cited 25×
• Bishop v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1996-01-22· cited 13×