Rice v. Oriental Fireworks Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “A corporation is, inadequately capitalized when its assets are insufficient to cover its potential liabilities, which are reasonably foreseeable from the nature of the corporation’s business.”
• it is improper conduct to dis- regard corporate roles and formalities that serve to protect the rights and define the responsibilities of owners, direc- tors, officers, employees, creditors, government entities, and the public at large.
• the party seeking to establish personal jurisdiction need only make a prima facie showing, through affidavits and supporting materials, of the facts necessary to meet the criteria for establishing piercing the corporate veil based on alter ego

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Hambleton Bros. Lumber Co. v. Balkin Enterprises, Inc.
  Ninth Circuit· 2005-02-10· cited 31×
• Salem Tent & Awning Co. v. Schmidt
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1986-05-21· cited 13×
• Alpine Packing Co. v. H.H. Keim Co.
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 1991-12-20· cited 8×
• Acrymed, Inc. v. Convatec
  D. Oregon· 2004-05-14· cited 8×
• Wetzel v. Sandlow
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2022-03-30· cited 8×
• Aero Planning International, Inc. v. Air Associates, Inc.
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1988-11-23· cited 6×
• Vuylsteke v. Broan
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2001-01-24· cited 6×
• Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Jacobson
  D. Oregon· 2012-06-08· cited 5×
• Klokke Corp. v. Classic Exposition, Inc.
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1996-03-06· cited 4×
• Morrissey v. Krystopowicz
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 2015-08-31· cited 3×
• Cerner Middle East Ltd. v. Belbadi Enterprises LLC
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2020-07-15· cited 2×
• Hambleton Bros. Lumber Co. v. Balkin Enterprises, Inc.
  Ninth Circuit· 2005-02-11

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• International Shoe Co. v. Washington
  Supreme Court· 1945-12-03· cited 18,588×
• World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. Woodson
  Supreme Court· 1980-01-21· cited 8,668×
• Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. Hall
  Supreme Court· 1984-04-24· cited 6,200×
• Minton v. Cavaney
  California Supreme Court· 1961-09-05· cited 125×
• Amfac Foods, Inc. v. International Systems & Controls Corp.
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1982-11-23· cited 80×
• State Ex Rel. Sweere v. Crookham
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1980-04-08· cited 39×
• Holfield v. Power Chemical Company, Inc.
  D. Maryland· 1974-09-26· cited 35×
• State Ex Rel. Ware v. Hieber
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1973-11-01· cited 34×
• State Ex Rel. La Manufacture Francaise Des Pneumatiques Michelin v. Wells
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1982-12-30· cited 31×
• Gardner v. First Escrow Corp.
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1985-03-20· cited 23×
• North Pacific Steamship Co. v. Guarisco
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1982-07-07· cited 15×