State Ex Rel. La Manufacture Francaise Des Pneumatiques Michelin v. Wells

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• requiring the defendant’s contacts to have “relevance to the substance of th[e] claim for relief’
• requiring the defendant’s contacts to have “relevance to the substance of th[e] claim for assertion of specific jurisdiction.”
• a defendant’s single contact with Oregon that is substantively relevant to the claim may be sufficient for personal jurisdiction
• “If a fact is irrelevant [to a claim] in a purely domestic dispute, it does not become related to the controversy simply because there are multistate elements.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).