· 4/11/2008
Rice v. Merit Systems Protection Board
Citations
- 522 F.3d 1311
- 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 7828
- 102 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1833
- 2008 WL 1018986
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that the Board’s decisions do not limit the application of Exum to circumstances when an agency knew or should have known that the employee was operating under a misapprehension regarding the effect of a change in position on the loss of appeal rights
- finding that the Board’s decisions do not limit the application of Exum to circumstances when an agency knew or should have known that the employee was operating under a misapprehension regarding the effect of a change in position on the loss of appeal rights
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bryson, Gajarsa, Linn
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.