Skip to main content
· 4/11/2008

Rice v. Merit Systems Protection Board

Citations

  • 522 F.3d 1311
  • 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 7828
  • 102 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1833
  • 2008 WL 1018986

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that the Board’s decisions do not limit the application of Exum to circumstances when an agency knew or should have known that the employee was operating under a misapprehension regarding the effect of a change in position on the loss of appeal rights
  • finding that the Board’s decisions do not limit the application of Exum to circumstances when an agency knew or should have known that the employee was operating under a misapprehension regarding the effect of a change in position on the loss of appeal rights

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bryson, Gajarsa, Linn

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.