Riccobono v. Pierce County

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The 7 Legislature intended that those statutes and regulations be the exclusive remedy for 8 breach.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

16 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Snyder v. Medical Service Corp.
  Washington Supreme Court· 2001-12-13· cited 140×
• Smith v. Bates Technical College
  Washington Supreme Court· 2000-01-27· cited 83×
• In re the Recall of Pearsall-Stipek
  Washington Supreme Court· 2000-09-28· cited 81×
• In Re Recall of Pearsall-Stipek
  Washington Supreme Court· 2000-10-17· cited 53×
• State v. Kunze
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1999-11-10· cited 36×
• Snyder v. Medical Service Corp.
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1999-12-02· cited 30×
• Allstot v. Edwards
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2003-04-03· cited 29×
• State v. Dolan
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2003-07-01· cited 29×
• State v. Dolan
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2003-10-07· cited 28×
• Vasquez v. STATE, DSHS
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1999-04-06· cited 21×
• Pagnotta v. Beall Trailers of Oregon, Inc.
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2000-01-25· cited 21×
• Barnett v. Sequim Valley Ranch, LLC
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2013-03-05· cited 15×
• Lins v. Children's Discovery Centers of America, Inc.
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1999-05-07· cited 13×
• Wahl v. Dash Point Family Dental Clinic, Inc.
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2008-04-15· cited 11×
• City of Tacoma v. Price
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2007-02-06· cited 4×
• Sequim Valley Ranch Llc, V Marie Barnett
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2013-03-05