Ricard v. Ricard

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting the only provision for alimony in annulment cases was for “the innocent party,” a status not enjoyed by Mrs. Ri-card
• discussing soundness of applying divorce alimony statute to annulment action
• discussing soundness of applying divorce alimony statute to annulment action
• interpreting nearly identical predecessor statute in this fashion
• interpreting nearly identical predecessor statute in this fashion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State ex rel. Wooten v. District Court
  Montana Supreme Court· 1920-04-08· cited 36×
• Pickard v. Pickard
  Supreme Court of Iowa· 1950-12-12· cited 7×
• Muwinski v. Muwinski
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1924-11-07· cited 7×
• Richard S. Levick v. Deborah MacDougall
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 2016-02-23· cited 3×
• In Re Estate of Carlisle
  Supreme Court of Iowa· 2002-11-14· cited 2×
• Richard S. Levick v. Deborah MacDougall
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 2015-09-15
• Deborah MacDougall v. Richard S. Levick
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 2015-09-15
• Deborah MacDougall v. Richard S. Levick
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 2015-10-27
• Deborah MacDougall v. Richard S. Levick
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 2016-02-23

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Hite v. Hite
  California Supreme Court· 1899-05-13· cited 45×
• Kimble v. Kimble
  Washington Supreme Court· 1897-05-06· cited 34×
• Lea v. . Lea
  Supreme Court of North Carolina· 1889-09-05· cited 24×
• Arey v. Arey
  Washington Supreme Court· 1900-03-16· cited 18×