Lea v. . Lea

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• action brought under current G.S. Sec. 50-4 (1984) is, pro-eedurally speaking, an action for divorce

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Chambers v. Ormiston
  Supreme Court of Rhode Island· 2007-12-07· cited 43×
• Bancroft v. Bancroft
  California Court of Appeal· 1935-10-15· cited 19×
• Arey v. Arey
  Washington Supreme Court· 1900-03-16· cited 18×
• Ricard v. Ricard
  Supreme Court of Iowa· 1909-06-05· cited 13×
• Sims Ex Rel. Sprinkle v. Sims
  Supreme Court of North Carolina· 1897-09-05· cited 12×
• Muwinski v. Muwinski
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1924-11-07· cited 7×
• Richard S. Levick v. Deborah MacDougall
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 2016-02-23· cited 3×
• Richard S. Levick v. Deborah MacDougall
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 2015-09-15
• Deborah MacDougall v. Richard S. Levick
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 2015-09-15
• Deborah MacDougall v. Richard S. Levick
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 2015-10-27
• Deborah MacDougall v. Richard S. Levick
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 2016-02-23