· 9/26/1966
Rhodig v. Cummings
Citations
- 418 P.2d 521
- 160 Colo. 499
- 1966 Colo. LEXIS 669
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding there was no reversible error when the trial court precluded defense experts from testifying to certain matters because “the defendant failed to make an offer of proof to show to the trial court or this [c]ourt what the testimony of the doctors” would have been
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Pringle
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.