Skip to main content
· 9/26/1966

Rhodig v. Cummings

Citations

  • 418 P.2d 521
  • 160 Colo. 499
  • 1966 Colo. LEXIS 669

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding there was no reversible error when the trial court precluded defense experts from testifying to certain matters because “the defendant failed to make an offer of proof to show to the trial court or this [c]ourt what the testimony of the doctors” would have been

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Pringle

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.