Good v. AB Chance Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding in accord with the analysis in Ault and stating that “evidence of post-accident warnings had a direct bearing on the [strict products] liability issue”
• holding in accord with the analysis in Ault and stating that \evidence of post-accident warnings had a direct bearing on the [strict products] liability issue\
• where trial court held not to have erred in allowing an economist testifying as an expert to base his testimony on charts prepared from statistics contained in official publications not in evidence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).