Rhodes v. Olson Associates, P.C.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that voicemails constituted communications for 8 purposes of Section 1962e
• finding it unnecessary to make individual determination of each potential class member’s subjective understanding of the debt collection letter in question
• “[T]he potential recovery for an individual plaintiff is unlikely to provide sufficient incentive for individual members to bring then1 own claims.”
• “Because the FDCPA is a strict liability statute, Plaintiff need demonstrate only one violation of its provisions to be entitled to a favorable judgment.”
• “To establish a violation of the FDCPA, Plaintiff must prove the following four elements: (1) Plaintiff is any natural person who is a ‘consumer’ within the meaning of 15 U.S.C. § 1692a(3); (2
• because FDCPA violations are judged by an objective “least sophisticated consumer” standard, court does “not have to make an individual determination of each potential class member’s subjective understanding of the [debt collection] letter in question”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Young v. Npas, Inc.
  D. Utah· 2019-02-05· cited 10×
• McWilliams v. Advanced Recovery Systems, Inc.
  S.D. Mississippi· 2015-11-03· cited 5×
• Rhodes v. National Collection Systems, Inc.
  D. Colorado· 2016-11-03

Cites

53 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.
  Supreme Court· 1986-06-25· cited 135,235×
• Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of Catrett
  Supreme Court· 1986-06-25· cited 119,442×
• Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Dukes
  Supreme Court· 2011-06-20· cited 4,653×
• Adler v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
  Tenth Circuit· 1998-05-18· cited 2,797×
• Marx v. General Revenue Corp.
  Supreme Court· 2013-02-26· cited 758×
• Wright Ex Rel. Trust Co. v. Abbott Laboratories, Inc.
  Tenth Circuit· 2001-08-06· cited 738×
• Bones v. Honeywell International, Inc.
  Tenth Circuit· 2004-04-23· cited 712×
• Atlantic Richfield Co. v. Farm Credit Bank of Wichita
  Tenth Circuit· 2000-09-13· cited 598×
• Christ Clomon v. Philip D. Jackson
  Second Circuit· 1993-03-17· cited 541×
• Esplin v. Hirschi
  Tenth Circuit· 1968-09-30· cited 393×
• Donna M. Russell v. Equifax A.R.S., and Cbi Collections
  Second Circuit· 1996-01-16· cited 370×
• Tabor v. Hilti, Inc.
  Tenth Circuit· 2013-01-15· cited 348×
• Rutter & Wilbanks Corp. v. Shell Oil Co.
  Tenth Circuit· 2002-12-24· cited 254×
• LeBlanc v. Unifund CCR Partners
  Eleventh Circuit· 2010-03-30· cited 241×
• J.B. Ex Rel. Hart v. Valdez
  Tenth Circuit· 1999-08-12· cited 220×
• Donohue v. Quick Collect, Inc.
  Ninth Circuit· 2010-01-13· cited 216×
• DG Ex Rel. Stricklin v. DeVaughn
  Tenth Circuit· 2010-02-08· cited 215×
• Shook v. El Paso County
  Tenth Circuit· 2004-10-18· cited 202×
• Gabriel Carrera v. Bayer Corp
  Third Circuit· 2013-08-21· cited 193×
• Terri L. Bass v. Stolper, Koritzinsky, Brewster & Neider, S.C. And Kathy Leschensky
  Seventh Circuit· 1997-04-18· cited 183×

Other cases named Rhodes v. Olson Associates, P.C.

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

• Rhodes v. Olson Associates, P.C.
  D. Colorado· 2015-06-12· cited 6×