Rhames v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the entire period of the requested continuance was excluded from the Rule 45 calculation because the defendant’s objection was never reported to the court

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Jeremiah Miguel Perez v. State of Alaska
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 2022-11-18· cited 2×
• Alaska Public Defender Agency v. Superior Court
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 2023-05-19

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Peterson v. State
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1977-04-20· cited 55×
• State v. Clouatre
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1973-12-17· cited 25×
• Massey v. State
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 1989-03-17· cited 25×
• Else v. State
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1976-11-08· cited 24×
• Bangs v. State
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1980-03-14· cited 22×
• DeGross v. State
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 1989-01-20· cited 18×
• Simpson v. State
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 1994-08-05· cited 16×
• State v. Jeske
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 1991-12-20· cited 11×
• State v. Angaiak
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 1993-03-05· cited 10×