Skip to main content

Reynolds v. State

Citations

  • 848 S.W.2d 148
  • 1993 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 49
  • 1993 WL 44425

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining how defendant was harmed from trial court’s failure to properly instruct jury on article 38.23
  • explaining how defendant was harmed from trial court's failure to properly instruct jury on article 38.23
  • when the defendant testified he was not speeding, it created a fact issue regarding the legality of the stop
  • ―[A]lthough a conclusion that the officer was mistaken would not affect the legitimacy of his stopping appellant, a conclusion that [the officer] was lying would.‖
  • “[A]lthough a conclusion that the officer was mistaken would not affect the legitimacy of his stopping appellant, a conclusion that [the officer] was lying would.”
  • DWI, where there was conflicting testimony regarding the speed of the vehicle, and “speeding” was the cause for stopping the vehicle

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Meyers, McCormick

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

41 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.