Skip to main content
· 8/21/1996

Reynolds v. Spears

Citations

  • 93 F.3d 428
  • 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 21151

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that a first person’s “listening to telephone conversations that [a second person] had unlawfully recorded are not interceptions” by the first person

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.