REYES
Citations
- 28 I. & N. Dec. 52
Syllabus
(1) If all of the means of committing a crime, based on the elements of the statute of conviction, amount to one or more of the offenses listed in section 101(a)(43) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. §1101(a)(43), then an alien who has been convicted of that crime has necessarily been convicted of an aggravated felony for purposes of the INA. (2) The respondent's conviction for grand larceny in the second degree under New York Penal Law § 155.40(1) qualifies as a conviction for an aggravated felony for purposes of the INA. DHS charged that the respondent had been convicted of either aggravated-felony theft or aggravated-felony fraud, as defined in section 101(a)(43)(G) and (M)(i) of the INA, 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(43)(G) and (M)(i). Larceny by acquiring lost property constitutes aggravated-felony theft, and the parties do not dispute that the other means of violating the New York statute correspond to either aggravated-felony theft or aggravated-felony fraud.
Cited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
29 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court· 1947-06-23· cited 3,981×
- Descamps v. United StatesSupreme Court· 2013-06-20· cited 2,997×
- Mathis v. United StatesSupreme Court· 2016-06-23· cited 2,769×
- Bowen v. Georgetown University HospitalSupreme Court· 1988-12-12· cited 2,039×
- Moncrieffe v. HolderSupreme Court· 2013-04-23· cited 1,263×
- Gonzales v. Duenas-AlvarezSupreme Court· 2007-01-17· cited 1,029×
- Nijhawan v. HolderSupreme Court· 2009-06-15· cited 738×
- Judulang v. HolderSupreme Court· 2011-12-12· cited 387×
- Esquivel-Quintana v. SessionsSupreme Court· 2017-05-30· cited 237×
- Shular v. United StatesSupreme Court· 2020-02-26· cited 207×
- Kawashima v. HolderSupreme Court· 2012-02-21· cited 133×
- United States v. Le' Ardrus BurrisSixth Circuit· 2019-01-03· cited 118×
- United States v. Becerril-LopezNinth Circuit· 2008-08-29· cited 111×
- United States v. FaustFirst Circuit· 2017-04-05· cited 79×
- United States v. Shaun ChapmanThird Circuit· 2017-08-04· cited 74×
- Unnamed caseThird Circuit· 2004-05-07· cited 67×
- Almeida v. HolderSecond Circuit· 2009-12-08· cited 35×
- Obeya v. SessionsSecond Circuit· 2018-03-08· cited 33×
- GARCIA-MADRUGABoard of Immigration Appeals· 2008-07-01· cited 33×
- De Niz Robles v. LynchTenth Circuit· 2015-10-20· cited 33×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.