Revels v. Pohle

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating further that “expert testimony is not required where ‘the negligence is so grossly apparent that a layman would have no difficulty in recognizing it’” (quoting Boyce v. Brown, 51 Ariz. 416, 421 (1938))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).