Carranza v. Tucson Medical Center

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding no expert testimony needed to recover on res ipsa theory for burn on child’s leg after heart surgery
• concluding expert testimony was not required where a child suffered a burn on her leg after heart surgery
• concluding expert testimony was not 28 1 | required to show a burn on child’s leg sustained during heart surgery could not have occurred without negligence because it was within the realm of common knowledge
• patient's leg burned during heart surgery

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).