Resurrection Sch. v. Elizabeth Hertel

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the capable of repetition yet evading review exception was “inapposite for largely the same reasons” as the voluntary cessation exception
• holding that a claim seeking prospective relief was “palpably” moot after the challenged mask mandate was rescinded with “no reasonable possibility” that a new mandate would be instituted
• determining that the cessation was genuine when eight months elapsed between the filing of the lawsuit and the agency’s rescission of its mandate for reasons unrelated to litigation
• “Regarding the likelihood that the same pandemic conditions we faced in 2020-21 will repeat themselves, it is hard to imagine that we could once again face anything quite like what confronted us then.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Other cases named Resurrection Sch. v. Elizabeth Hertel

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

• Resurrection Sch. v. Elizabeth Hertel
  Sixth Circuit· 2021-08-23· cited 7×
• Resurrection Sch. v. Elizabeth Hertel
  Sixth Circuit· 2021-11-10