S.D. New York· 3/6/1967
Resort Bus Lines, Inc. v. the Interstate Commerce Commission
Citations
- 264 F. Supp. 742
- 1967 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9256
Judges: Kaufman, Circuit Judge, and Weinfeld and MacMahon, District Judges
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
9 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Kansas City Southern Railway Company v. Great Lakes Carbon CorporationEighth Circuit· 1980-06-16· cited 84×
- New York v. United StatesSecond Circuit· 1977-03-02· cited 33×
- North American Van Lines, Inc. v. Interstate Commerce CommissionN.D. Indiana· 1974-12-05· cited 9×
- State of New York v. United StatesSecond Circuit· 1977-06-06· cited 5×
- Chicago & North Western Railway Co. v. United StatesN.D. Illinois· 1970-03-31· cited 4×
- AAACon Auto Transport Inc. v. United StatesS.D. New York· 1970-10-16· cited 3×
- Greyhound Lines, Inc. v. United StatesN.D. Illinois· 1968-05-06· cited 2×
- New York City Transit Authority v. United States of America and Interstate Commerce CommissionSecond Circuit· 1987-12-04
- United Trucking Service, Inc. v. United StatesE.D. Michigan· 1973-05-25
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court· 1951-02-26· cited 8,363×
- Consolo v. Federal Maritime CommissionSupreme Court· 1966-03-24· cited 2,949×
- Illinois Central Railroad v. Norfolk & Western Railway Co.Supreme Court· 1967-01-09· cited 216×
- United States v. Rock Island Motor Transit Co.Supreme Court· 1951-04-09· cited 61×
- Sprague v. WollSeventh Circuit· 1941-07-22· cited 23×
- Alamo Express, Inc. v. United StatesW.D. Texas· 1965-03-20· cited 14×
- Transamerican Freight Lines, Inc. v. United StatesD. Delaware· 1966-08-31· cited 6×
- United States v. Interstate Commerce CommissionDistrict of Columbia· 1963-09-19· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.