Skip to main content
Federal Circuit· 12/18/2008

Rentrop v. Spectranetics Corp.

Citations

  • 550 F.3d 1112
  • 89 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1417
  • 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 25357
  • 2008 WL 5246496

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[W]hen there is a relevant change in the law before entry of final judgment, a party generally must notify the district court; if the party fails to do so, it waives arguments on appeal that are based on that change in the law.”
  • “[W]hen there is a relevant change in the law before entry of final judgment, a party generally must notify the district court; if the party fails to do so, it waives arguments on appeal that are based on that change in the law.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Michel, Friedman, Walker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Rentrop v. Spectranetics Corp.

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.