Skip to main content
· 11/21/1996

Religious Technology Center v. F.A.C.T.Net, Inc.

Citations

  • 945 F. Supp. 1470
  • 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17468
  • 1996 WL 677046

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • declining to disqualify defense attorney because Plaintiffs had not met their burden to prove the attorney was a “necessary witness,” – meaning the testimony is relevant, material and unobtainable elsewhere

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kane

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.