Skip to main content
· 3/4/2003

Employer's Reinsurance Corp. v. Clarendon National Insurance

Citations

  • 213 F.R.D. 422
  • 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4704
  • 2003 WL 1554673

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • denying permissive intervention because Rule 24(b) “is expressly predicated on an applicant being possessed of a claim,” and the union had no such claim in a Section 10() proceeding

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hara, James

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.