· 3/4/2003
Employer's Reinsurance Corp. v. Clarendon National Insurance
Citations
- 213 F.R.D. 422
- 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4704
- 2003 WL 1554673
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- denying permissive intervention because Rule 24(b) “is expressly predicated on an applicant being possessed of a claim,” and the union had no such claim in a Section 10() proceeding
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hara, James
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.