Reinhart v. Lugo
Citations
- 86 Cal. 395
- 24 P. 1089
- 1890 Cal. LEXIS 1040
Syllabus
<p>Vacating Judgment by Default — Power of Court—Discretion — Review on Appeal.—The supreme court will not interfere with the action of the trial court in making an order setting aside a default, and judgment thereon, and permitting the defaulting party to answer, where it appears to have been made upon an affidavit of merits, unless it affirmatively appears that the court was without jurisdiction to make the order, or abused its discretion in making it.</p> <p>Id.—Proof of Service of Summons — Void Certificate of Deputy Sheriff. —The act and return of a deputy sheriff is a nullity, unless done in the name and by the authority of the sheriff; and a certificate of the service of summons by a deputy sheriff, or one acting as such, is void as proof of such service, if signed by the deputy in his own name, and not sworn to, nor purporting to be an affidavit of service; and a judgment by default will be set aside upon motion, if rendered upon such proof of service.</p> <p>Id.—Jurisdiction of Person—Void Judgment.—If proof of service of summons is not made as required by law, the court acquires no jurisdiction of the persons of defendants, and has no authority to render judgment against them, and any judgment rendered without such proof is invalid and void, and may be set aside upon motion.</p> <p>Id.—Entry of Default — Proof of Service — Authority of Clerk — Ministerial Functions—Condition Precedent.—The clerk of the trial court has no authority to enter a default of a defendant upon a void certificate of service of summons. The clerk in entering defaults exercises no judicial functions, but acts merely in a ministerial capacity, and unless he confines himself strictly within the statute, his acts can have no binding force. Before default can be regularly taken against a party, there must be positive and sufficient evidence in court of due service, and no substantial defect in that respect can be cured by subsequent knowledge of the fact.</p> <p>Id. — Supplying Proof of
Judges: Fox
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
21 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Westphal v. WestphalCalifornia Supreme Court· 1942-05-27· cited 87×
- Norton v. Atchison, Topeka, & Santa Fé RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court· 1893-02-25· cited 59×
- Love v. National Liberty InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia· 1924-01-17· cited 50×
- Herman v. SanteeCalifornia Supreme Court· 1894-08-13· cited 42×
- Thompson v. CookCalifornia Supreme Court· 1942-07-15· cited 41×
- Bell v. BellArizona Supreme Court· 1934-12-18· cited 27×
- Linott v. RowlandCalifornia Supreme Court· 1897-12-29· cited 21×
- Hibernia Savings & Loan Society v. MatthaiCalifornia Supreme Court· 1897-04-07· cited 16×
- Woods v. StallworthCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1960-01-28· cited 13×
- Plott v. YorkCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1939-06-23· cited 12×
- Cunningham v. Spokane Hydraulic Mining Co.Washington Supreme Court· 1898-12-31· cited 8×
- Vermont Loan & Trust Co. v. McGregorIdaho Supreme Court· 1897-11-16· cited 8×
- Turnquist v. KjelbakNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1956-07-13· cited 7×
- Sucesión Igaravídez v. Rubert HermanosSupreme Court of Puerto Rico· 1915-12-08· cited 6×
- Ex parte Bithorn Vda. de BenítezSupreme Court of Puerto Rico· 1938-07-20· cited 6×
- Taliaferro v. TaliaferroCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1963-06-17· cited 5×
- Thompson Bros. v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Iowa· 1924-11-19· cited 5×
- Gilbert v. American Trust & Savings BankAppellate Court of Illinois· 1905-04-18· cited 4×
- Kelvinator Sales Co. v. HarBerks County Court of Common Pleas· 1930-09-13
- Succession of Igaravídez v. Rubert Bros.Supreme Court of Puerto Rico· 1915-12-08
Cites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- People v. GreeneCalifornia Supreme Court· 1887-12-23· cited 84×
- Willson v. CleavelandCalifornia Supreme Court· 1866-07-15· cited 34×
- Kelly v. Van AustinCalifornia Supreme Court· 1861-07-01· cited 30×
- Rowley v. HowardCalifornia Supreme Court· 1863-07-01· cited 18×
- Thompson v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court· 1882-03-27· cited 16×
- Joyce v. JoyceCalifornia Supreme Court· 1855-07-01· cited 12×
- Lyons v. CunninghamCalifornia Supreme Court· 1884-10-28· cited 9×
- Johnson v. DelbridgeMichigan Supreme Court· 1877-01-16· cited 6×
- Reinhart v. LugoCalifornia Supreme Court· 1888-04-27· cited 4×
Other cases named Reinhart v. Lugo
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.