Cunningham v. Spokane Hydraulic Mining Co.
Citations
- 20 Wash. 450
- 55 P. 756
- 1898 Wash. LEXIS 548
Syllabus
<p>FOREIGN JUDGMENTS-AMENDMENT OP RECORD—EVIDENCE.</p> <p>In an action on a foreign judgment, the judgment roll is admissible in evidence, although it appears therefrom that subsequent to the entry of judgment the return was amended so as to show that defendant had been duly served, hut without personal notice to the defendant of the proposed amendment, where the judgment was by default and the statute of the state in which judgment was had did not require personal notice in such cases.</p>
Judges: Dunbar
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Love v. National Liberty InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia· 1924-01-17· cited 50×
- Williams v. Steamship Mutual Underwriting Ass'nWashington Supreme Court· 1954-08-24· cited 37×
- Bourgeious v. Santa Fe Trail Stages, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court· 1939-10-16· cited 20×
- State Furniture Co. v. AbramsNebraska Supreme Court· 1945-07-06· cited 9×
- Von Arx v. BooneNinth Circuit· 1912-02-05· cited 5×
- Cunningham v. Spokane Hydraulic Mining Co.Washington Supreme Court· 1899-10-11
Cites
5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Matter of the Estate Op Bernard NewManCalifornia Supreme Court· 1888-03-01· cited 124×
- Herman v. SanteeCalifornia Supreme Court· 1894-08-13· cited 42×
- Drake v. DuvenickCalifornia Supreme Court· 1873-07-01· cited 40×
- Reinhart v. LugoCalifornia Supreme Court· 1890-11-20· cited 38×
- Cahoon v. LevyCalifornia Supreme Court· 1856-07-01· cited 10×
Other cases named Cunningham v. Spokane Hydraulic Mining Co.
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.