Skip to main content
· 11/3/2010

Reichardt v. Creasey

Citations

  • 379 S.W.3d 655
  • 2010 Ark. App. 736
  • 2010 Ark. App. LEXIS 787

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “In our view, E-435 survives scrutiny under [the McDade Amendment] and the Supremacy Clause because it is simply-an ethical rule and does not affect federal substantive, procedural, or evidentiaiy law.” (footnote omitted)
  • “In our view, E–435 survives scrutiny under [the McDade Amendment] and the Supremacy Clause because it is simply an ethical rule and does not affect federal substantive, procedural, or evidentiary law.” (footnote omitted)
  • “In our view, E–435 survives scrutiny under [the McDade Amendment] and the Supremacy Clause because it is simply an ethical rule and does not affect federal substantive, procedural, or evidentiary law.” (footnote omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gruber, Hart, Robbins

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.