· 11/3/2010
Reichardt v. Creasey
Citations
- 379 S.W.3d 655
- 2010 Ark. App. 736
- 2010 Ark. App. LEXIS 787
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “In our view, E-435 survives scrutiny under [the McDade Amendment] and the Supremacy Clause because it is simply-an ethical rule and does not affect federal substantive, procedural, or evidentiaiy law.” (footnote omitted)
- “In our view, E–435 survives scrutiny under [the McDade Amendment] and the Supremacy Clause because it is simply an ethical rule and does not affect federal substantive, procedural, or evidentiary law.” (footnote omitted)
- “In our view, E–435 survives scrutiny under [the McDade Amendment] and the Supremacy Clause because it is simply an ethical rule and does not affect federal substantive, procedural, or evidentiary law.” (footnote omitted)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Gruber, Hart, Robbins
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.