Skip to main content
· 5/12/2004

Vinson v. Ritter

Citations

  • 167 S.W.3d 162
  • 86 Ark. App. 207
  • 2004 Ark. App. LEXIS 359

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • rejecting argument that this court should re-adopt supreme court’s former standard of substantial compliance when dealing with defective summons

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Karen R. Baker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.