Reich-Bacot v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• to be entitled to a charge on self-defense, a defendant is essentially required to admit committing the conduct giving rise to the indictment
• to be entitled to a charge on self-defense, a defendant is essentially required to admit committing the conduct giving rise to the indictment
• to be entitled to a charge on self-defense, a defendant is essentially required to admit committing the conduct giving rise to the indictment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Timothy Uddley v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 7th Dist. (Amarillo)· 2008-12-22
• Withers, Margaret v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 1999-05-06
• Robert Ferdinand Goehring v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 2004-08-19
• George Hernandez Jr v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2006-07-20

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Almanza v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1985-02-27· cited 6,557×
• Hamel v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1996-01-24· cited 361×
• Houston v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1993-02-10· cited 23×
• Reich-Bacot v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 1990-04-30· cited 21×
• Reich-Bacot v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1996-10-30· cited 14×
• Land v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 1997-03-27· cited 10×
• Reich-Bacot v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1997-08-13· cited 10×
• Reich-Bacot v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 1996-04-17· cited 9×
• Ex Parte Ramirez
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1996-04-10· cited 8×
• Reich-Bacot v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 1997-03-17· cited 5×
• Reich-Bacot v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 1997-11-13· cited 4×