Regenlab U.S. LLC v. Estar Techs. Ltd.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding home offices as “place of the defendant” when its employees had products and small centrifuges in their homes
• holding 15 that the home offices of employees are a physical place in the district because all the company’s 16 employees work from home
• observing that because all employees of the defendant worked from home, their home offices constituted a primary physical location for the defendant's business
• holding home offices as “place of the defendant” when its employees had products and small centrifuges in their homes
• observing that because all employees of the defendant worked from home, their home offices constituted a primary physical location for the defendant's business
• stressing that the “employees did not merely possess [sales kits]—their use in New York was part of each employee’s job description”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Arcadia Biosciences, Inc. v. Vilmorin & Cie
  S.D. Illinois· 2019-01-25· cited 37×
• Tour Tech. Software, Inc. v. RTV, Inc.
  E.D. New York· 2019-03-27· cited 11×
• McDonough v. Cycling Sports Grp., Inc.
  W.D. New York· 2019-08-06· cited 3×
• In Re MONOLITHIC POWER SYSTEMS, INC.
  Federal Circuit· 2022-09-30
• Clark v. Docusign, Inc.
  District of Columbia· 2022-11-10
• Clark v. Docusign, Inc.
  District of Columbia· 2022-11-15

Cites

52 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• International Shoe Co. v. Washington
  Supreme Court· 1945-12-03· cited 18,588×
• Burger King Corp. v. Rudzewicz
  Supreme Court· 1985-05-20· cited 12,253×
• Hanson v. Denckla
  Supreme Court· 1958-10-13· cited 7,025×
• Walden v. Fiore
  Supreme Court· 2014-02-25· cited 3,814×
• Asahi Metal Industry Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., Solano Cty.
  Supreme Court· 1987-02-24· cited 3,642×
• Marks v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1977-03-01· cited 2,149×
• J. McIntyre Machinery, Ltd. v. Nicastro
  Supreme Court· 2011-06-27· cited 953×
• Residential Funding Corporation v. Degeorge Financial Corp., Degeorge Home Alliance, Inc. And Degeorge Capital Corp
  Second Circuit· 2002-09-26· cited 503×
• Penguin Group (USA) Inc. v. American Buddha
  Second Circuit· 2010-06-15· cited 464×
• Beverly Hills Fan Company v. Royal Sovereign Corp. And Ultec Enterprises Co., Ltd.
  Federal Circuit· 1994-03-08· cited 346×
• TC Heartland LLC v. Kraft Foods Group Brands LLC
  Supreme Court· 2017-05-22· cited 302×
• Bank Brussels Lambert v. Fiddler Gonzalez & Rodriguez
  Second Circuit· 2002-09-20· cited 278×
• Eades v. Kennedy, PC Law Offices
  Second Circuit· 2015-06-04· cited 237×
• In Re: Cray Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 2017-09-21· cited 195×
• Electronics for Imaging, Inc. v. Jan R. Coyle and Kolbet Labs
  Federal Circuit· 2003-09-04· cited 177×
• LaMarca v. Pak-Mor Manufacturing Co.
  New York Court of Appeals· 2000-07-06· cited 175×
• Kernan v. Kurz-Hastings, Inc.
  Second Circuit· 1999-04-15· cited 168×
• Nuance Communications, Inc. v. Abbyy Software House
  Federal Circuit· 2010-11-12· cited 166×
• Schnell v. Peter Eckrich & Sons, Inc.
  Supreme Court· 1961-02-20· cited 146×
• United States v. Swiss American Bank, Ltd.
  First Circuit· 1999-09-10· cited 143×