Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 6/8/1994
Reese v. State
Citations
- 877 S.W.2d 328
- 1994 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 68
- 1994 WL 244967
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding no inducement when criminal design originates in mind of accused and law enforcement officials merely furnish opportunity for or aid in commission of crime
- “A witness may not withhold all of the evidence demanded of him merely because some of it may be protected from disclosure by the Fifth Amendment.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Overstreet, McCormick, Clinton, Meyers, Baird, Campbell, White
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
56 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Shaw v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2007-10-31· cited 444×
- State v. TerrazasCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1998-02-04· cited 116×
- Pennington v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2001-10-04· cited 100×
- Sanchez v. StateTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2003-01-23· cited 53×
- Hartson v. StateTex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 2001-10-11· cited 36×
- Phelps v. StateTex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 1999-10-20· cited 34×
- Miller v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1997-02-27· cited 21×
- Guia v. StateTex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 2007-04-17· cited 19×
- Walters, William KyleCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2011-12-07· cited 19×
- Eric Ramirez v. State of TexasTex. App. Ct., 7th Dist. (Amarillo)· 2002-04-12· cited 17×
- Land v. StateTex. App. Ct., 9th Dist. (Beaumont)· 1994-12-30· cited 14×
- Adams v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2008-08-29· cited 13×
- Trevino v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2001-11-01· cited 11×
- Courtney v. StateTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 1996-01-10· cited 11×
- Davis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1994-08-03· cited 5×
- Zarate v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2018-04-18· cited 5×
- Reese v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1994-12-15· cited 1×
- Troy Neal Hooper v. StateTex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 2015-07-29
- Sanchez, Mario James v. StateTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2003-01-23
- Daequinjamin Lavor Williams v. StateTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2004-08-26
Cites
30 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Rochin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1952-01-02· cited 3,286×
- Hoffman v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1951-05-28· cited 1,874×
- Sorrells v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1932-12-19· cited 1,793×
- Hampton v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1976-04-27· cited 910×
- United States v. Phillip Onori and Theodore BukkyFifth Circuit· 1976-07-26· cited 205×
- Jack Marrin Williamson and Morris Lee Lowrey v. United StatesFifth Circuit· 1963-03-05· cited 193×
- Cherb v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1971-11-02· cited 153×
- United States v. Adalberto Cervantes-Pacheco, Jerry Wayne Nelson and William E. NelsonFifth Circuit· 1987-08-21· cited 151×
- United States v. Ivan Melchor Moreno and Rigoberto Melchor MorenoFifth Circuit· 1976-08-09· cited 120×
- Norman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1979-09-19· cited 120×
- Booth v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1984-06-13· cited 117×
- Brody v. GuercioSupreme Court· 1988-01-19· cited 116×
- United States v. Joe Garcia, Guillermo Sandoval, and Mario SandovalFifth Circuit· 1976-04-26· cited 67×
- United States v. William Dale YaterFifth Circuit· 1985-03-21· cited 65×
- Richardson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1981-10-21· cited 64×
- Lopez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1978-12-20· cited 62×
- Kramsvogel v. WisconsinSupreme Court· 1985-10-15· cited 62×
- Webb v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1955-03-09· cited 45×
- United States v. Charles Edward JonesSixth Circuit· 1978-04-27· cited 37×
- Joe Hill, Jr. v. United StatesFifth Circuit· 1964-04-13· cited 35×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.