New Mexico Supreme Court· 11/19/1987
Reese v. State
Citations
- 745 P.2d 1153
- 106 N.M. 505
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that court may deviate from doctrine of law of the case in order to avoid manifest injustice
- holding that the law of the case is a flexible, discretionary doctrine
- stating that 4 1 a court may decline to apply the doctrine if application “would result in a manifest 2 injustice”
- quoting, 5 Am.Jur.2d Appeal and Error § 750 at 194 (1962)
- “It is a general rule that ignorance or mistake of fact is a defense when it negates the existence of a mental state essential to the crime charged”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Sosa, Walters, Ransom, Scarborough, Stowers
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
21 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Trujillo v. City of AlbuquerqueNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1998-09-08· cited 163×
- State v. BreitNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1996-12-06· cited 153×
- State v. ChamberlainNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1991-09-25· cited 135×
- Clark v. TansyNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1994-09-07· cited 71×
- State Ex Rel. King v. UU Bar Ranch Ltd. PartnershipNew Mexico Supreme Court· 2009-03-05· cited 58×
- State v. NozieNew Mexico Supreme Court· 2009-04-22· cited 41×
- Valdez v. WarnerNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1987-09-15· cited 38×
- Perez v. StateNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1990-12-20· cited 36×
- State v. GreenNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1993-09-21· cited 32×
- State v. GibsonNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1992-02-10· cited 30×
- Elephant Butte Irrigation District v. Regents of New Mexico State UniversityNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1993-01-14· cited 18×
- Sundial Press v. City of AlbuquerqueNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1992-06-23· cited 16×
- State v. NozieNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2007-08-07· cited 14×
- Stroh Brewery Co. v. Director of New Mexico Department of Alcoholic Beverage ControlNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1991-08-12· cited 13×
- State v. NozieNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2007-09-25· cited 13×
- Kucel v. New Mexico Medical Review CommissionNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2000-01-24· cited 11×
- Garcia v. GarciaNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2009-10-30· cited 10×
- State v. HilliardNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1988-07-19· cited 7×
- Aguilera v. Palm Harbor Homes, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals· 2004-08-06· cited 7×
- State v. GodkinNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2015-08-20· cited 3×
Cites
12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- United States v. FeolaSupreme Court· 1975-03-19· cited 856×
- Pollock v. Farmers' Loan & Trust Co.Supreme Court· 1895-04-08· cited 605×
- Peoples v. Judicial Standards CommissionSupreme Court· 1979-06-11· cited 174×
- Greene v. RothschildWashington Supreme Court· 1965-05-20· cited 77×
- Reese v. StateNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1987-11-03· cited 35×
- Farmers' State Bank of Texhoma v. Clayton Nat. BankNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1925-09-04· cited 34×
- Ute Park Summer Homes Ass'n v. Maxwell Land Grant Co.New Mexico Supreme Court· 1972-03-10· cited 22×
- Rutledge v. FortNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1986-03-04· cited 17×
- Royal International Optical Co. v. Texas State Optical Co.New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1978-09-12· cited 16×
- Killeen v. Community HospitalNew York Supreme Court· 1979-10-10· cited 5×
- Crary v. FieldNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1900-05-03· cited 5×
- State v. MontoyaNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1980-08-29· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.