Skip to main content

Reed v. State

Citations

  • 281 A.2d 142
  • 1971 Del. LEXIS 229

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • the photograph of the defendant bore the date of the day after the offense, whereas the other photographs used in the identification process bore dates of earlier years — held, not impermissibly suggestive

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wolcott, Carey, Herrmann

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

16 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.