Missouri Court of Appeals· 11/11/1902
Reed v. Reed
Citations
- 101 Mo. App. 176
- 70 S.W. 505
- 1902 Mo. App. LEXIS 258
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “The error is presumed to be prejudicial where it is not shown to be harmless.”
- \The error is presumed to be prejudicial where it is not shown to be harmless.\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Barclay, Bland, Goode
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Tune v. Synergy Gas Corp.Supreme Court of Missouri· 1994-09-20· cited 90×
- State v. WooleySupreme Court of Missouri· 1909-01-04· cited 20×
- Breimon v. General Motors Corp.Court of Appeals of Washington· 1973-04-16· cited 18×
- McMillin v. McMillinMissouri Court of Appeals· 1982-04-13· cited 15×
- Gruner v. GrunerMissouri Court of Appeals· 1914-04-07· cited 12×
- Steiwer v. SteiwerOregon Supreme Court· 1924-11-12· cited 7×
Cites
1 case in this archive is cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.