Reed v. Commonwealth

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• facilitation of a transaction by an individual does not, standing alone, constitute conspiracy
• “In order to convict defendant of conspiring . . . to distribute a controlled drug, the Commonwealth had to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that an agreement existed between the two men[.]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Floyd v. Commonwealth
  Supreme Court of Virginia· 1978-11-22· cited 170×
• Feigley v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 1993-07-13· cited 85×
• Zuniga v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 1988-12-20· cited 68×
• Fortune v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 1991-06-11· cited 45×
• State v. Ortiz
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1975-12-02· cited 39×
• Jones v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 1990-09-18· cited 19×
• Wood v. Commonwealth
  Supreme Court of Virginia· 1973-06-11· cited 14×
• Poole v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 1988-12-20· cited 14×
• Johnson v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 2003-12-23· cited 4×
• Commonwealth v. Doty
  Massachusetts Appeals Court· 2015-09-03· cited 3×
• Commonwealth v. Richard
  Supreme Court of Virginia· 2021-12-29

Cites

1 case in this archive is cited by this case.

• Smith v. Commonwealth
  Supreme Court of Virginia· 1972-03-06· cited 2×