Feigley v. Commonwealth

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that prejudice may be shown if “court-appointed attorney conducted an inadequate investigation, was unprepared for trial, or failed to pursue a vigorous defense”
• holding that evidence of a “single isolated” distribution of cocaine by the defendant to the buyer’s “agent” and receipt of money in return for the cocaine from the “agent” was not sufficient to show any agreement between the defendant and the “agent” to distribute drugs
• finding the “trial date was more than six months after Feigley’s first attorney -3- had been appointed,” coupled with his last minute continuance request, were factors supporting the denial of his continuance
• \The fact finder resolves all conflicts in the evidence.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).