Supreme Court· 2/21/1979
Reece v. United States
Citations
- 440 U.S. 908
- 59 L. Ed. 2d 456
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- mailings taking place after the object of the scheme has been accomplished are not sufficiently related to the plan to support a mail fraud conviction
- mailings taking place after the object of the scheme has been accomplished are not sufficiently related to the plan to support a mail fraud conviction
- recognizing certain areas in which the Register “has considerable expertise”
- prosecutor's comment did not result in \clear error\ because of the \significant factor\ of the strength of the case against defendant
- mail to victim to give appearance of legitimacy of business transaction is in furtherance of conspiracy
- prosecutor’s comment did not result in “clear error” because of the “significant factor” of the strength of the case against defendant
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Cited by
118 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Clarence E. Bennett v. Kenneth Berg, Dan R. Sandford, Jr. v. Kenneth BergEighth Circuit· 1982-08-11· cited 384×
- Durham Industries, Inc. v. Tomy CorporationSecond Circuit· 1980-09-02· cited 328×
- United States v. RiccobeneThird Circuit· 1983-05-20· cited 238×
- United States v. Leonard A. PelulloThird Circuit· 1994-03-22· cited 229×
- United States v. Jose Angel Diaz-CarreonFifth Circuit· 1990-11-13· cited 215×
- United States v. EufrasioThird Circuit· 1991-05-15· cited 202×
- General Motors Corporation, a Delaware Corporation v. William D. Ruckelshaus, Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency, (3 Cases)D.C. Circuit· 1984-09-07· cited 169×
- United States v. Eliot H. Weisman and Salvatore J. CannatellaSecond Circuit· 1980-04-04· cited 152×
- United States v. Ernest Lopez, United States of America v. John Vlahovich, United States of America v. Paula NadirNinth Circuit· 1986-10-30· cited 137×
- State v. LoukWest Virginia Supreme Court· 1983-03-25· cited 122×
- United States v. EspinosaTenth Circuit· 1985-08-26· cited 115×
- United States v. Mack Allen RichardsonFifth Circuit· 1988-06-21· cited 113×
- Carol Barnhart Inc. v. Economy Cover CorporationSecond Circuit· 1985-09-12· cited 97×
- United States v. Paul Deluca, Robert Kaye, James Danno, and John LeeNinth Circuit· 1982-11-22· cited 91×
- United States of America, at Nos. 89-5372/5383, at No. 89-5510 v. Gaetano Vastola, at No. 89-5372, at No. 89-5510 v. Elias Saka, at No. 89-5383Third Circuit· 1990-03-20· cited 83×
- United States v. ZauberThird Circuit· 1988-08-31· cited 73×
- Mobil Oil Corp. v. Department of EnergyTemporary Emergency Court of Appeals· 1979-11-19· cited 73×
- Barry Kieselstein-Cord v. Accessories by Pearl, Inc.Second Circuit· 1980-09-18· cited 68×
- United States v. Ryan, JamesThird Circuit· 1987-09-15· cited 68×
- United States v. Paul DicaroSeventh Circuit· 1985-10-04· cited 67×
Other cases named Reece v. United States
14 other CourtListener records share this case name.
- Reece v. United StatesEleventh Circuit· 1997-08-08· cited 30×
- Reece v. United StatesFifth Circuit· 1942-10-31· cited 9×
- Reece v. United StatesW.D. Missouri· 1927-02-02· cited 2×
- Reece v. United StatesNinth Circuit· 2001-05-31
- Reece v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1943-02-01
- Reece v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1969-03-10
- Reece v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1969-04-21
- Reece v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1995-05-30
- Reece v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1995-05-30
- Reece v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1998-03-02
- Reece v. United StatesSupreme Court· 2004-01-12
- Reece v. United StatesSupreme Court· 2004-01-12
- Reece v. United StatesSupreme Court· 2000-12-11
- Reece v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1995-10-10
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.