United States v. Eliot H. Weisman and Salvatore J. Cannatella

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that substantially identical language is “certainly broad enough on its face to include conspiracies”
• pattern of racketeering activity must be done “in the conduct of the affairs of an ‘enterprise’ ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).