Redinger v. Clapper's Tree Service Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding “urban or mixed use land is not outside the ambit of [Recreational Use of Land and Water Act]”
• deciding separate issue but noting that “[i]n spite of its conciseness and apparent simplicity, the [model act] has managed to weave a tortured tapestry of decisional law in a multitude of jurisdictions in which it as been enacted”
• maintenance of trees by owner of recreational land does not nullify its immunity from claim of injury from falling tree limb
• extending statutory protection only to unimproved land
• noting inconsistency of case law

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).