De Baritault Ex Rel. De Baritault v. Salt Lake City Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that Act does not apply to city park in residential area within Salt Lake City limits
• stating that the characteristic of “undeveloped” is another “prerequisite to immunity under the recreational use statutes”
• holding urban park outside scope of Limitation of Landowner Liability Act
• reasoning that “ ‘[w]hen a construction of an act will bring it into serious conflict with another act, our duty is to construe the acts to be in harmony and avoid conflicts’ ” (quoting Jerz v. Salt Lake County, 822 P.2d 770, 773 (Utah 1991))
• “[W]ell-established principles of statutory construction require that a more specific statute governs instead of a more general statute.” (citation omitted)
• municipality is not immune from liability for injuries sustained at city park

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).