Skip to main content

Redding v. State

Citations

  • 873 S.E.2d 158
  • 313 Ga. 730

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that a claim that is “so patently meritless that its denial is certain” would render “remand for consideration of [that] issue . . . a waste of judicial resources”
  • holding that the trial court improperly “failed to weigh” the reason-for-the-delay factor where it “failed to address the amount of time involved in each delay” that was part of the pre- trial period and failed to attribute it to the appellant or the State
  • vacating judgment and remanding to the trial court to appropriately apply the law to its analysis of an issue
  • vacating and remanding where the trial court failed to expressly calculate the length of the delay and did not consider the length of the delay factor separately, among other errors
  • vacating and remanding where the trial court “did not explicitly calculate the length of the delay,” did not “consider[ ] [the length-of-the-delay factor] separately,” and “failed to weigh each Barker factor”
  • trial court erred by “ruling that [a]ppellant’s probation hold precluded the need to assess prejudice associated with oppressive pretrial incarceration”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.