Skip to main content
D.C. Circuit· 6/29/1977

Realty Income Trust v. Eckerd

Citations

  • 183 U.S. App. D.C. 426
  • 564 F.2d 447
  • 10 ERC 1342
  • 7 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20541
  • 10 ERC (BNA) 1342
  • 1977 U.S. App. LEXIS 12668

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “equity should not require the doing of a ‘vain or useless thing’”
  • indicating that the first rationale for injunctions is that “a project should not proceed, with its often irreversible effect on the environment, until the possible adverse consequences are known”
  • construction of a $25 million federal office building was proposed specific action of known dimensions
  • “[A] party is not precluded from asserting cognizable injury to environmental values because his ‘real’ or ‘obvious’ interest may be viewed as monetary”
  • erection of new office building alleged to cause loss of rental income and injury to the environment due to impact on vehicular and pedestrian traffic
  • “[W]hen an action is being .undertaken in violation of NEPA, there is a presumption that injunc-tive relief should be granted against continuation of the action until the agency brings itself into compliance.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bazelon, McGowan, Wilkey

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

72 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.