Skip to main content
· 1/26/1981

Carlos Romero-Barcelo, Etc. v. Harold Brown

Citations

  • 643 F.2d 835
  • 11 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20391
  • 16 ERC (BNA) 1593
  • 1981 U.S. App. LEXIS 20682
  • 16 ERC 1593

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[Q]uestions of motivation are particularly inappropriate for resolution on a motion for summary judgment”
  • “the federal requirements enforceable under section 12 [of the Noise Control Act] are the best evidence of the type of noise control requirement that Congress intended to be enforceable by suit against a federal agency.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Coffin, Campbell, Bownes

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.