Realpage, Inc. v. Yardi Systems, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that in light of Eastman Kodak , plaintiff had pleaded a negative tying claim
• denying motion to dismiss where complaint explained in qualitative terms why certain “conceivably interchangeable substitutes” were not “specialized to the needs” of defendant’s customers
• dismissing interference claim because a plaintiff did not state that “any actual breach or disruption” had occurred but only that “a breach or disruption could occur”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).