Skip to main content

Rea v. State

Citations

  • 297 S.W.3d 379
  • 2009 WL 2059443

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that alleged violations of statutes by Board and its decision to continue with disciplinary proceeding were preliminary to SOAH administrative hearing, not final agency action
  • concluding that Rea’s claims were not ripe in absence of final agency decision
  • concluding that Rea's claims were not ripe in absence of final agency decision
  • “To establish that a claim is ripe based on an injury that is likely to occur, the plaintiff must demonstrate that the injury is imminent, direct, and immediate, and not merely remote, conjectural, or hypothetical.”
  • “To establish that a claim is ripe based on an injury that is likely to occur, the plaintiff must demonstrate that the injury is imminent, direct, and immediate, and not merely remote, conjectural, or hypothetical.”
  • “To establish that a claim is ripe based on an injury that is likely to occur, 17 the plaintiff must demonstrate that the injury is imminent, direct, and immediate, and not merely remote, conjectural, or hypothetical.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Patterson, Pemberton, Waldrop

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

22 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.