R.D.H. Communications, Ltd. v. Winston

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “the exhaustion of appeals rule manipulates the concept of legal injury”
• applying rule in part because client-plaintiff had not “hire[d] a new attorney” and “stay[ed] the course with” attorney-defendant
• applying rule in part because client-plaintiff had not \hire[d] a new attorney\ and \stay[ed] the course with\ attorney-defendant
• “[a client’s] decision to stay the course with [his attorney] is not one this court should second-guess in relation to the statute of limitations issue”
• “The rule’s primary purpose is to avoid placing a client in the untenable position of suing his attorney while the latter continues to represent him.”
• “The court in Winston also set an outer bound on the duration of the ‘specific dispute’—it does not include appeals.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).